Hyacinth's weight

Dave Tallman · 03 Sep 2010, 05:28 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: davetallman at msn.com (Dave Tallman)
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 23:28:09 -0600
Subject: (urth) Hyacinth's weight
Message-ID: <AANLkTikDTvaOxTARO1zXpzK+L07jeOv_QSp2J=0t6UsK at mail.gmail.com>

I've been looking around in CofLS and EftLS and I have yet to find any
reference to Hyacinth's weight being unusually low. I seem to have exhausted
all the times Silk and Hy were together. Does anyone know where to find
these?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100902/6640a945/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net