Hyacinth's weight

James Wynn · 13 Sep 2010, 16:03 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:03:13 -0500
Subject: (urth) Hyacinth's weight
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikDTvaOxTARO1zXpzK+L07jeOv_QSp2J=0t6UsK at mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikDTvaOxTARO1zXpzK+L07jeOv_QSp2J=0t6UsK at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C8E4B41.4020203 at gmail.com>

  On 9/3/2010 12:28 AM, Dave Tallman wrote:
> I've been looking around in CofLS and EftLS and I have yet to find any 
> reference to Hyacinth's weight being unusually low. I seem to have 
> exhausted all the times Silk and Hy were together. Does anyone know 
> where to find these?

I'm back and released from my imprisonment. I also had trouble 
relocating these references by normal hunt and peck methods.  I've 
started another pass through the books. But I'm quite certain they were 
referenced. Back in the day when I was arguing that Hy might be a chem, 
I conceded that weight was a hurtful blow because it had been referenced 
about her at least twice.

u+16b9

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net