(no subject)
Son of Witz · 16 Dec 2010, 18:53
· from 2010-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:53:10 -0800 Subject: (urth) (no subject) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=su9pJXrfr2aaT_Nk+ciBgg4HHh7zM1=XXhC_m at mail.gmail.com> References: <SNT123-W15AD332116F21B51B93CBFCF150 at phx.gbl> <AANLkTi=su9pJXrfr2aaT_Nk+ciBgg4HHh7zM1=XXhC_m at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2D2A3EE5-9718-46FC-8B59-DEC0461968AD at butcherbaker.org> On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Matthew Weber <palaeologos at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > But I remain unconvinced that our God and Jesus Christ make any appearances in the Sun series. > I'd need either more direct Christian references (call it a crucifix, not a "rood"=rod) or fewer > monsters and demons. > > > I would think that "rood" is used primarily to refer to a cross, or the Cross. The sense in which it means "rod" or "staff" is even more obscure than the Christian one. > > I have to confess that the assumption I sometimes see at work here, that Wolfe always takes the longest way possible around everything, baffles and bemuses me. Using the word "rood" to signify a cross or crucifix is a way of distancing the phenomenon; if he merely said "cross" or "crucifix" it would seem very cozily Christian to us. But the BotNS is set in a far future in which Christianity may be only a distant, mythic memory--or perhaps it's a distant past in which Christianity has not yet appeared. So calling it a rood rather than a crucifix or cross renders it intelligible and retains a slight whiff of Christianity (as a survival of long ago?) without suggesting that the denizens of Urth practice what we understand to be the Christian faith. > > -- > Matt + > > Thanks for that. I completely agree about the distance obscuration. I think Wolfe is tricksy, but I think people mistrust him too much. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20101216/cab6522c/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net