NPR Results

Lane Haygood · 11 Aug 2011, 16:12 · from 2011-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: lhaygood at gmail.com (Lane Haygood)
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:12:28 -0500
Subject: (urth) NPR Results
In-Reply-To: <CAM0v-i6Hddmq04fTsXn+f5R_8LLykYq63UKVk-T3VNsbAyz38w at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM0v-i4--4D+VcSbN3+17ufSotEg=2YrzLL6d7sD4ANLp1sjtA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFk60+dmj_h=FQkCCt=xPzgQ8c1NwhRnE=3VFMONk_fPO0+RxA at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFjGSaeyd7UrZT8Mn+DD_jZe_kpfsE9aHkKvSCAOn9dpdsxrjg at mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM0v-i6Hddmq04fTsXn+f5R_8LLykYq63UKVk-T3VNsbAyz38w at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52338ACC-9EC0-44E4-BD54-E74842C1D9E0 at gmail.com>

Also, NPR only seems more intellectual because its competition is pop music and "morning shows" run by two aging burnouts named Jack Dingo and Toadstool. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 11, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Antonin Scriabin <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree about the gulags!
> 
> Anyways, this list is especially embarrassing since NPR listeners have a (vague) reputation for being intellectuals, and a cut above the typical reader.  Guess not.  I see a lot of stuff on the list that I was really into when I was 8-10 (Terry Brooks, David Eddings, etc.), then quickly outgrew when I realized that there was vastly superior science fiction and fantasy out there.  I think a lot of the voting that went into this list was fueled by the nostalgia of people who never "grew-up" out of the formative junk that a lot of us cut our sci-fi teeth on as kids.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com> wrote:
> This has shaken my faith in the correctness of democracy.
> 
> I mean, would it be SO terrible to force people into good literature
> gulags? Eighteen hours a day, reading away, lulled to silence by the
> gentle crack of the overseer's whips?
> 
> I mean, people put "The Sword of Truth" and those drecky "Forgotten
> Realms" novels ahead of Wolfe and Mieville? They NEED re-education.
> 
> LH
> 
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Greg Bates <gregory.a.bates at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, at least it beat the EU Star Wars tripe. By one spot. :-(
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Antonin Scriabin
> > <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.npr.org/2011/08/11/139085843/your-picks-top-100-science-fiction-fantasy-books
> >>
> >> The Book of the New Sun clocked in at #87.  Appalling original list, and
> >> terrible final results, but at the end of the day, maybe people will check
> >> out Wolfe after seeing his book listed here.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Urth Mailing List
> >> To post, write urth at urth.net
> >> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Urth Mailing List
> > To post, write urth at urth.net
> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110811/a4515e78/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net