Personal attacks

Ryan Dunn · 22 Nov 2011, 17:26 · from 2011-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: ryan at liftingfaces.com (Ryan Dunn)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:26:51 -0500
Subject: (urth) Personal attacks
In-Reply-To: <CAGB0RZ7soHzwgsepUO-AGX3w8-WdyF4nrzcA5vx3m5GTFTTNew at mail.gmail.com>
References: <4ECBC7B3.4040208 at gmail.com>
	<1321979739.93975.YahooMailClassic at web161806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CAGB0RZ7soHzwgsepUO-AGX3w8-WdyF4nrzcA5vx3m5GTFTTNew at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <144B6893-DC55-4D74-B73A-8553A1DB5A68 at liftingfaces.com>

My suspicion is that America may have a balanced budget before there is a streamlined Urth compendium.

I think the trusty old search-for-keyword, followed by minutes-and-minutes of wheat and chaff separation is here to stay.

...ryan

On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wow, thanks for the admirable willingness to publicly apologise for any part you may have had in it, Marc.  
>  
> On a different but related note, is there a Wolfe scholar out there who could make a digest of the main outlines of the main arguments on this mega-behemoth of a list?
>  
> -DOJP
> 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks
> > To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> > Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM
> > Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
> > > I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled
> > Babbiecorn... for this
> > > very reason, Mo.
> > >
> > > There is a thin but important line between passionate
> > discourse and
> > > slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of
> > late.
> > >
> > > Thanks you for raising the concern.
> >
> > I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of
> > the other's ideas to criticism of the other's
> > intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think
> > whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in
> > order.
> >
> > You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting
> > the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry.
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize.  It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :(  I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew.  Sorry.
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111122/2097a9d0/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net