children?

Daniel Fusch · 26 Oct 1999, 23:32 · from urth-v0028.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Daniel Fusch" <dfusch at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Re: children?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:32:17 PDT
Message-ID: <urth-v0028-0259 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0259.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Shannon,

(snip)
My point is that good,and
>great, literature is both timeless and ageless for
>those with the mind's eye to see.

Good point! I also discovered many of my favorite books at an early=20
age...Lord of the Rings at age 8, A Wrinkle in Time at age 7 or 8, Kipling=20
shortly afterward, and so on.

Great literature IS ageless/timeless! Maybe, then, we should hope that all=20
the great novels--past and present--survive into the future as children's=20
lit!

Daniel

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net