Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Oannes

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 19 Mar 2012, 19:53 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:53:02 -0700
Subject: (urth) Oannes
In-Reply-To: <4F678D1C.6030108 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W37A8FAC722FE3B6DA463F7CF420 at phx.gbl>
	<4F67779B.9020000 at gmail.com>
	<1332183362.71950.YahooMailNeo at web84103.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4F678D1C.6030108 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ8=rtiK2VVq2zcF4HuuoKxLxf3mfdA5V_=U8K0Vvzp1s3K3tg at mail.gmail.com>

James Wynn wrote:
DAVID STOCKHOFF wrote:
>> Also, are there any examples of an impersonal finite god? Or would that
>> just be a BDO?

> That's a good question. Big Dumb Object is an interesting term for it. An
> impersonal finite god would be a god drained of everything worthy of
> worship.

It seems to me that the God of Deism is pretty close to an impersonal
finite God.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net