Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Oannes

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 19 Mar 2012, 21:01 · from 2012-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:01:22 -0700
Subject: (urth) Oannes
In-Reply-To: <1332190613.60266.YahooMailNeo at web84105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <SNT123-W37A8FAC722FE3B6DA463F7CF420 at phx.gbl>
	<4F67779B.9020000 at gmail.com>
	<1332183362.71950.YahooMailNeo at web84103.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4F678D1C.6030108 at gmail.com>
	<1332187052.93885.YahooMailNeo at web84107.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<4F6795AA.6080600 at gmail.com>
	<1332190613.60266.YahooMailNeo at web84105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ8=rtgcZLrPqa1j0dvDVud53UdXx-Oa6sAW+iVLWbpBvEvRvA at mail.gmail.com>

DAVID STOCKHOFF wrote:

> pets are just such beings, granted
> personality only by their owners' powers of projection.

Obviously you are not a pet person. They have personality; one cat or
dog is _quite_ different from another. (Hamsters, not so much...) What
they may lack is person_hood_.


> At any rate, if one were to worship one's cat, it would probably be a lot
> like worshiping an impersonal, finite god.

Ask an ancient Egyptian ;)

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net