The irrigation of Lune

Andy Robertson · 03 Mar 2002, 19:46 · from urth-v0203.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: (urth) Re: The irrigation of Lune
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:46:03 -0000
Message-ID: <urth-v0203-272 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0203/272.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com>
> > "Port of Lune".
>
> Why would the work of the hierodules necessarily have to be revered,
> when they themselves are referred to in such glowing terms as
> "cacogens"? Urthlings could just lump it in with Skuld and Verthandi as
> worlds they see in the sky, but not necessarily terribly important.


Hmmm.   A fair point, but I still disagree.

I have said all I justly can.   I think we must now accept that our
interpretation of the text differs, and leave it there.

    hartshorn









--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net