Urth Net

Index · 23 messages · 9 voices · 01 Mar – 11 Mar 2002

The irrigation of Lune

Download this conversation
Andy Robertson01 Mar 2002, 07:43originalas archived
The irrigation of Lune
↰ answers Jeff Wilson · by quotation
----- Original Message -----
3 quoted lines
From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com> No. During the Apollo program, the measured amount of gas surrounding the moon remained fairly constant, despite each landing adding an amount of gaseous exhaust equal to the original natural contents.
I will chase this up :-)
1 quoted line
That would require "adding" the mass of Mars, at least.
So?
1 quoted line
I don't see why it is necessary to limit things to Terran technology.
"That was before they got it irrigated" as old Rudesind says. The word "irrigated" was what made me think of dumping volatiles on the surface - giant comets from the Oort and so forth. "Irrigated" does not sound like transcendent Hierodule tech. It sounds like a lot of ice being dumped on the Moon.
9 quoted lines
Father Inire's gardens the various magic mirrors The Ship The Atrium of Time Master Ash's house Hildegrin's wrestling match Severian discovering his own ancient tomb the pool in Yesod Severian whispering in his own ear
But - and this is crucial - none of these works are of planetforming scale. The equation of BOTNS is planetforming works of the Hierodules = redemptive hand of god This is after all explicit in the very title of the sequence! Lune has no **spiritual** weight. That is why the Hierdoules can not be involved in the irrigation of Lune. Besides, we know that it was Typhon who wounded the sun from his speech with Severian. The conclusion is that human attempts to influence the solar system are behind it. **Human** tech put the black hole in the center of the sun. To terraform Lune is small peas beside that.
1 quoted line
Heinlein's "Orphans" is set in a morally indifferent universe and its wonders appeal to the authority of science to justify suspension of disbelief.
Yes, and the Whorl is a metatextual reference to it as well as to the countless O'Neill's that have graced SF. It is a ship built by Men and does not fly through Time or past the walls of the Universe. hartshorn
Timothy Reilly02 Mar 2002, 03:16originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
2 quoted lines
Andy Robertson wrote: Besides, we know that it was Typhon who wounded the sun from his speech with Severian. The conclusion is that human attempts to influence the solar system are behind it. **Human** tech put the black hole in the center of the sun.
Are you sure? What part of which speech do you have in mind? Tim
Jeff Wilson02 Mar 2002, 06:37originalas archived
↳ follows Timothy Reilly · by subject
7 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com>
No. During the Apollo program, the measured amount of gas surrounding the moon remained fairly constant, despite each landing adding an amount of gaseous exhaust equal to the original natural contents.
I will chase this up :-)
That would require "adding" the mass of Mars, at least.
So?
So it makes it pointless to build the moon to the size of Mars when you already have a Mars-sized body, namely Mars.
2 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
I don't see why it is necessary to limit things to Terran technology.
"That was before they got it irrigated" as old Rudesind says. The word "irrigated" was what made me think of dumping volatiles on the surface - giant comets from the Oort and so forth. "Irrigated" does not sound like transcendent Hierodule tech. It sounds like a lot of ice being dumped on the Moon.
Rudesind and others of his society can't be expected to be cognizant of what else besides mere irrigation would be required to cover the moon with forest. After whatever other modifications it would take to keep an atmosphere in place, yes it would have to be irrigated. And while it does not sound like something of ineffable, recall that Father Inire's Gardens allow a confluence of Gyoll and the Lake of Birds; for all we know he diverted a tributary of the Brook Madregot to water Green/Lune. In addition, this sort of sweeping up and piling of asteroids would relieve the metal scarcity problem supposedly caused by all the ships and ordnance leaving Urth, never or seldom to return.
10 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
Father Inire's gardens the various magic mirrors The Ship The Atrium of Time Master Ash's house Hildegrin's wrestling match Severian discovering his own ancient tomb the pool in Yesod Severian whispering in his own ear
But - and this is crucial - none of these works are of planetforming scale.
The Yesod planet most certainly is; it's either an artificial planet or one so heavily modified it might as well be. It also seems to have normal gravity despite its interior being machinery with access spaces, rather than solid rock.
3 quoted lines
Lune has no **spiritual** weight. That is why the Hierdoules can not be involved in the irrigation of Lune.
I don't follow you. They seem to be involved in numerous other unspiritual undertakings, like trafficking with Baldanders.
1 quoted line
Besides, we know that it was Typhon who wounded the sun from his speech with Severian. The conclusion is that human attempts to influence the solar system are behind it. **Human** tech put the black hole in the center of the sun.
perhaps, he may have had help from Dark Lords / Great Beasts / whatever.
1 quoted line
To terraform Lune is small peas beside that.
So which is it? Small peas, or beyond the scope of anything I could list? The alteration of gravity could be easy for the hierodules, and there's already an example of an area of the Palace that has zero gravity permanently or at least at will, and almost every appearance of hierodules and the other ilk of Yesod features some kind of bending of the rules of time and space.
2 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
Heinlein's "Orphans" is set in a morally indifferent universe and its wonders appeal to the authority of science to justify suspension of disbelief.
Yes, and the Whorl is a metatextual reference to it as well as to the countless O'Neill's that have graced SF. It is a ship built by Men and does not fly through Time or past the walls of the Universe.
Have you not read Planet Of The Apes or seen the original film? The Whorl doesn't need any special qualities to travel through a warp in space and time any more than anyone visiting the Botanical Gardens do. If the servants of the Increate put it there, it's there for the Whorl to go through, with no more trouble than the old man's raft had reaching the location just right for Severian to fall in and find Dorcas.
Jeff Wilson How Am I Posting? 1-800-555-6789 "If your SecOp can see you, so can the enemy." -Cpt Law --
Andy Robertson02 Mar 2002, 08:59originalas archived
↳ follows Jeff Wilson · by subject
----- Original Message -----
2 quoted lines
From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com> So it makes it pointless to build the moon to the size of Mars when you already have a Mars-sized body, namely Mars.
My position is this. In TBOTNS there are three levels of technology: 1) the "medaeval" or blacksmith level, to which most of the world has been relegated by resource poverty: 2) the "terran" level, which humanity still has mastery of, but only the rich have the resources to use 3) the "galactic" level, which has always been beyond human control, nd corresponds to "magic" in a thematic sense. This seems pretty sound, because Wolfe actually spells it out. The problem is that we can not adduce constraints from "real science" in Wolfe's work even at level 2). Wolfe is very cavalier about such things. Now, the Whorl is a product, perhaps the ultimate product, of level 2). The Ship is a product of level 3). Therefore the Whorl will not be doing the numinous things the Ship does. I can't prove it does not move through time, but there is no real hint of it doing so. Is Lune a product of level 2) or 3)? My argument is that it "feels" like a product of level 2). I freely admit that this is based on the way the characters in TBOTNS talk and sspeak about it, not on abstract considerations. There is no awe addressed to Lune, nothing holy or remarkable about it. It is just a place. "Port of Lune". hartshorn
Andy Robertson02 Mar 2002, 09:04originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
----- Original Message -----
3 quoted lines
From: "Timothy Reilly" <treilly at ozemail.com.au> Are you sure? What part of which speech do you have in mind?
The bit in SOTL where Typhon and Severian are speaking. "My astronomers had told me that this sun's activity would decay slowly . . They were wrong . . . " clearly implies that the astronomers and Typhon knew what was going on at the sun's core and therefore had a part in it.
Jeff Wilson03 Mar 2002, 04:17originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
12 quoted lines
From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
My position is this. In TBOTNS there are three levels of technology: 1) the "medaeval" or blacksmith level, to which most of the world has been relegated by resource poverty: 2) the "terran" level, which humanity still has mastery of, but only the rich have the resources to use 3) the "galactic" level, which has always been beyond human control, nd corresponds to "magic" in a thematic sense. This seems pretty sound, because Wolfe actually spells it out.
I'm with you so far,
1 quoted line
The problem is that we can not adduce constraints from "real science" in Wolfe's work even at level 2). Wolfe is very cavalier about such things.
No kidding. Some times he is even gasp mistaken!
3 quoted lines
Now, the Whorl is a product, perhaps the ultimate product, of level 2). The Ship is a product of level 3). Therefore the Whorl will not be doing the numinous things the Ship does. I can't prove it does not move through time, but there is no real hint of it doing so.
The Whorl doesn't need to do anything "numinous," only to be subject to the plans of the Increate. I am sure you will agree that it is, like everything else in Briah? Can that plan not include a space warp that returns the Whorl unknowingly to Urth? I have already gone over various other occurences of this theme in Sun boooks. This sort of unknowing return, on the part of the traveler or those who remained, appears in the Bible, Greek myth, classic SF, and even other Wolfe books.
9 quoted lines
Is Lune a product of level 2) or 3)? My argument is that it "feels" like a product of level 2). I freely admit that this is based on the way the characters in TBOTNS talk and sspeak about it, not on abstract considerations. There is no awe addressed to Lune, nothing holy or remarkable about it. It is just a place. "Port of Lune".
Why would the work of the hierodules necessarily have to be revered, when they themselves are referred to in such glowing terms as "cacogens"? Urthlings could just lump it in with Skuld and Verthandi as worlds they see in the sky, but not necessarily terribly important.
Jeff Wilson How Am I Posting? 1-800-555-6789 "If your SecOp can see you, so can the enemy." -Cpt Law --
Andy Robertson03 Mar 2002, 19:46originalas archived
↳ follows Jeff Wilson · by subject
----- Original Message -----
3 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com> "Port of Lune".
Why would the work of the hierodules necessarily have to be revered, when they themselves are referred to in such glowing terms as "cacogens"? Urthlings could just lump it in with Skuld and Verthandi as worlds they see in the sky, but not necessarily terribly important.
Hmmm. A fair point, but I still disagree. I have said all I justly can. I think we must now accept that our interpretation of the text differs, and leave it there. hartshorn
Timothy Reilly04 Mar 2002, 04:03originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy Reilly" <treilly at ozemail.com.au>
Are you sure? What part of which speech do you have in mind?
The bit in SOTL where Typhon and Severian are speaking. "My astronomers had told me that this sun's activity would decay slowly . . They were wrong . . . " clearly implies that the astronomers and Typhon knew what was going on at the sun's core and therefore had a part in it.
No - this certainly doesn't follow logically. Astronomers today think they know what's happening at the sun's core, but can hardly be said to have contributed to it! I've always read the words as naturally meaning only what they say, that Typhon's advisers were aware that the sun's activity was declining, but underestimated how fast. Nor on my reading is there any possible motivation for Typhon putting a black hole at the sun's core - it hardly helps him. He's an evil tyrant, but shows no inclination to destroy all human kind (himself included).
Roy C. Lackey04 Mar 2002, 07:09originalas archived
↳ follows Timothy Reilly · by subject
5 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy Reilly" <treilly at ozemail.com.au>
Are you sure? What part of which speech do you have in mind?
The bit in SOTL where Typhon and Severian are speaking. "My astronomers had told me that this sun's activity would decay slowly . . They were wrong . . . " clearly implies that the astronomers and Typhon knew what was going on at the sun's core and therefore had a part in it.
No - this certainly doesn't follow logically. Astronomers today think they know what's happening at the sun's core, but can hardly be said to have contributed to it! I've always read the words as naturally meaning only what they say, that Typhon's advisers were aware that the sun's activity was declining, but underestimated how fast. Nor on my reading is there any possible motivation for Typhon putting a black hole at the sun's core - it hardly helps him. He's an evil tyrant, but shows no inclination to destroy all human kind (himself included).
I agree. Not only is there no apparent motivation; I doubt that Typhon had the ability. Technology on Urth in Typhon's day was considerably more advanced than in Severian's, but was but a shadow of what mean-old, nasty-old Man possessed in its heyday of galaxy hopping and creating new life forms. The sun's decline led to crop failures, riots, and revolt. Things were so bad that Typhon's cronies left the planet, taking all available transport, and left Typhon besieged on his mountain. Who is responsible for the black hole in the sun is an important plot point, it seems to me, because it bears directly on the ultimate goal of the Urth Cycle; the pretext for, and the coming of, the New Sun. If Man, in his presumptive arrogance, caused the wounding of the sun, that is one thing. If agents of the Increate caused it, as retribution, that is something else entirely. I have always adhered to the latter view, and I think the weight of evidence from the fifth volume of the series supports that view. -Roy
Michael Straight04 Mar 2002, 13:02originalas archived
↳ follows Roy C. Lackey · by subject
2 quoted lines · depth 3
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Roy C. Lackey wrote: The bit in SOTL where Typhon and Severian are speaking. "My astronomers had told me that this sun's activity would decay slowly . . They were wrong . . . " clearly implies that the astronomers and Typhon knew what was going on at the sun's core and therefore had a part in it.
I read this to mean that Typhon's astronomers hadn't even detected the black hole's effects, that they were telling him about the sun's normal life-cycle as a star, until it was too late.
1 quoted line
Who is responsible for the black hole in the sun is an important plot point, it seems to me, because it bears directly on the ultimate goal of the Urth Cycle; the pretext for, and the coming of, the New Sun. If Man, in his presumptive arrogance, caused the wounding of the sun, that is one thing. If agents of the Increate caused it, as retribution, that is something else entirely. I have always adhered to the latter view, and I think the weight of evidence from the fifth volume of the series supports that view.
You've left out the third option, which I think is the correct one, that the wounding of the sun was caused by extraterrestrial enemies of Man, Abaia and Erebus, who swim between the stars (and whose sister, I believe, is the Mother on Blue). -Rostrum
Andy Robertson04 Mar 2002, 13:07originalas archived
↳ follows Michael Straight · by subject
----- Original Message -----
2 quoted lines · depth 2
From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net> declining, but underestimated how fast. Nor on my reading is there any possible motivation for Typhon putting a black hole at the sun's core - it hardly helps him. He's an evil tyrant, but shows no inclination to destroy all human kind (himself included).
A point here: I have a background in astrophyics and cosmology, and I know that it would be quite "easy" to create a black hole and drop it into the sun. It is not too far beyond our own technology today. I mean only a thousand years or so. The theory is simple. On the other hand, cancelling out the black hole with a White Fountain is a million times harder. I have no idea how we would go about it even in principle. I have always assumed that the sun was wounded by Typhon. The idea that it was in fact done by Abia and her cohorts is an interesting one: Perhaps Typhon had it done in alliance with her? The idea of Typhon allying with these forces for revenge, or simply as a sort of Sampson strategy, is compelling. hartshorn
Roy C. Lackey04 Mar 2002, 21:59originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
2 quoted lines · depth 2
Rostrum quoted me and wrote: Who is responsible for the black hole in the sun is an important plot point, it seems to me, because it bears directly on the ultimate goal of the Urth Cycle; the pretext for, and the coming of, the New Sun. If Man, in his presumptive arrogance, caused the wounding of the sun, that is one thing.
If
8 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
agents of the Increate caused it, as retribution, that is something else entirely. I have always adhered to the latter view, and I think the weight of evidence from the fifth volume of the series supports that view.
You've left out the third option, which I think is the correct one, that the wounding of the sun was caused by extraterrestrial enemies of Man, Abaia and Erebus, who swim between the stars (and whose sister, I believe, is the Mother on Blue).
And hartshorn wrote: I have always assumed that the sun was wounded by Typhon. The idea that it was in fact done by Abia and her cohorts is an interesting one: Perhaps Typhon had it done in alliance with her? The idea of Typhon allying with these forces for revenge, or simply as a sort of Sampson strategy, is compelling.
Revenge for what? Typhon didn't want to pull the Temple down; he wanted to create a new empire with Urth, the ancestral home of mankind, as its symbolic center. He would have been cutting his own throat to ally himself with any party bent on the future of ice. "I have told you that I was autarch on many worlds. I shall be autarch again, and this time on many more. This world, the most ancient of all, I made my capital. That was an error, because I lingered too long when disaster came. By the time I would have escaped, escape was no longer open to me . . ." The Red Sun wasn't part of his plans. As for Abaia & Co. being responsible for the black hole: if they were, then it was only a symbolic gesture. Man had long ago dispersed across the galaxies. Whatever happened to Urth, a used-up backwater planet, would have no impact on the species, was of no real consequence for Man, at least in this iteration of the universe. Urth's only importance, even for the Increate, was symbolic. If Abaia & Co. were responsible for the wounding of the sun, then they were unwitting agents of the Increate, who were doing His bidding, whether they would or no. The entire purpose, in Wolfe's universe, of the wounding of the sun, of Sev's sham trial, and the coming of the New Sun, was to satisfy the whims of the Increate. As Tzadkiel told Sev: "Or if you wish to put it another way, you have already passed your testing, which was an examination of the future you will create. You are the New Sun. You will be returned to your Urth, and the White Fountain will go with you. The death agonies of the world you know will be offered to the Increate. And they will be indescribable--continents will flounder, as has been said. Much that is beautiful will perish, and with it most of your race; but your home will be reborn." -Roy
Michael Straight05 Mar 2002, 00:43originalas archived
↳ follows Roy C. Lackey · by subject
2 quoted lines
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Roy C. Lackey wrote: As for Abaia & Co. being responsible for the black hole: if they were, then it was only a symbolic gesture.
Yet they continue to act against the Autarchy and to try to prevent Severian from bringing the New Sun.
2 quoted lines
If Abaia & Co. were responsible for the wounding of the sun, then they were unwitting agents of the Increate, who were doing His bidding, whether they would or no. The entire purpose, in Wolfe's universe, of the wounding of the sun, of Sev's sham trial, and the coming of the New Sun, was to satisfy the whims of the Increate.
Here we get into deep philosophical/theological waters. This is like saying that the Romans didn't really crucify Jesus, or if they did they were the unwitting agents of God, who were doing his will whether they would or no. The entire purpose, on this reading, of the crucifixion and the resurrection was to satisfy the whims of God. And there are certainly people who read the New Testament that way. But there is also the reading that the crucifixion was an evil act committed by the Romans et. al. for which they bear guilt and responsibility, yet God twisted and turned that evil thing and brought good out of it. I submit this is probably the closer to the sense Wolfe intends, that the dying sun is a bad thing, caused by the evil of Abaia et. al., and probably also in some sense the result of humanity's own sins coming home to roost, yet the Increate takes this and turns it to his own purposes. How much all this ultimately boils down to satisfying the whims of the Increate depends on one's views of divine foreknowledge, omnipotence, predestination, determinism, free will, etc. -Rostrum
Andy Robertson05 Mar 2002, 18:47originalas archived
↳ follows Michael Straight · by subject
----- Original Message -----
5 quoted lines
From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net> To: <urth at urth.net> "I have told you that I was autarch on many worlds. I shall be autarch again, and this time on many more. This world, the most ancient of all, I made my capital. That was an error, because I lingered too long when disaster came. By the time I would have escaped, escape was no longer open to me . . ." The Red Sun wasn't part of his plans.
As gracefully as possible, I yeild to you & the majority of the list on this point. You have convinced me that Typhon did not kill the Sun. harshorn
matthew.malthouse06 Mar 2002, 11:17originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
5 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On 02/03/2002 06:37:36 Jeff Wilson wrote: From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Rudesind and others of his society can't be expected to be cognizant of what else besides mere irrigation would be required to cover the moon with forest. After whatever other modifications it would take to keep an atmosphere in place, yes it would have to be irrigated. And while it does not sound like something of ineffable, recall that Father Inire's Gardens allow a confluence of Gyoll and the Lake of Birds; for all we know he diverted a tributary of the Brook Madregot to water Green/Lune. In addition, this sort of sweeping up and piling of asteroids would relieve the metal scarcity problem supposedly caused by all the ships and ordnance leaving Urth, never or seldom to return.
Out of curiosity does anyone have near to hand an estimate of the mass of the solar system, what proportion of that would be in the small bodies and what proportion of those metals? Following the thought logically, rather than with literary intent, mining / collecting metals in near space would seem an obvious move once space flight was available. It doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that this had been done. Hence my curiosity about quantity because that and usage rates might suggest timescales. Matthew
matthew.malthouse06 Mar 2002, 11:54originalas archived
↳ follows matthew.malthouse · by subject
2 quoted lines
On 04/03/2002 07:09:45 Roy C. Lackey wrote: Who is responsible for the black hole in the sun is an important plot point, it seems to me, because it bears directly on the ultimate goal of the Urth Cycle; the pretext for, and the coming of, the New Sun. If Man, in his presumptive arrogance, caused the wounding of the sun, that is one thing.
If
1 quoted line
agents of the Increate caused it, as retribution, that is something else entirely. I have always adhered to the latter view, and I think the weight of evidence from the fifth volume of the series supports that view.
Why "Retribution"? The Increate's servants seem to be looking for - or even forcing - some sort of redemption in Man. If they are responsible for the wounding of the sun (a view I favour) I'd be more inclined to see it as a stimulus or goad pushing towards that goal. Matthew
Andy Robertson06 Mar 2002, 10:48originalas archived
↳ follows matthew.malthouse · by subject
----- Original Message -----
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
From: <matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk> In addition, this sort of sweeping up and piling of asteroids would relieve the metal scarcity problem supposedly caused by all the ships and ordnance leaving Urth, never or seldom to return.
Out of curiosity does anyone have near to hand an estimate of the mass of the solar system, what proportion of that would be in the small bodies and what proportion of those metals?
The total mass in the asteroid belt is less than that of the Moon. Of the order of 10% is metal mostly iron/nickel IIRC, the rest is silica slag. In the Oort Cloud (beyind Neptune) there could be almost any amount "Shortage of metal" is not in fact very probable. Metal is not used up except in tiny quantities by atomic reactions and stuff, and the very small amounts that leave in spaceships. So it is really a matter of the energy to gather it together and refine it. But I remember some interviews with Wolfe where he says that copper and even iron are "running out" . . . . either he has the wrong idea or he is taking large artistic license. hartshorn
matthew.malthouse06 Mar 2002, 13:14originalas archived
↳ follows Andy Robertson · by subject
6 quoted lines
On 06/03/2002 10:48:40 Andy Robertson wrote: Metal is not used up except in tiny quantities by atomic reactions and stuff, and the very small amounts that leave in spaceships. So it is really a matter of the energy to gather it together and refine it. But I remember some interviews with Wolfe where he says that copper and even iron are "running out" . . . . either he has the wrong idea or he is taking large artistic license.
Perhaps the word "Accessible" should be in there? The Commonwealth of Severian's time has access to space flight but only as provided for them, not to do with as they will. The the long inhabitation having exhausted the metals exctracted as ores "mining" becomes the recovery and recycling operation of Saltus. Urth cannot be litterally exhausted of metals because part of the promise of the New Sun is a renewal and we see that achieved bu the upheavals that "drown continents" etc. Matthew
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes06 Mar 2002, 16:40originalas archived
↳ follows matthew.malthouse · by subject
2 quoted lines
Roy wrote: If agents of the Increate caused it, as retribution, that is something else entirely.
And Matthew responded:
3 quoted lines
Why "Retribution"? The Increate's servants seem to be looking for - or even forcing - some sort of redemption in Man. If they are responsible for the wounding of the sun (a view I favour) I'd be more inclined to see it as a stimulus or goad pushing towards that goal.
I may be wrong, but I seem to recall a passage -- and it's about time for my periodic rereading of tBotNS (which will probably wind up being a period rereading of the whole Sun metaseries) -- in which Severian reports being told that the wounding of the Sun is part of a larger plan to isolate humanity until we are matured or redeemed or repentant or, well, whatever, enough to be allowed to go out and play with the rest of the galaxy. Does anyone else recall this, or am I dreaming it?
Roy C. Lackey07 Mar 2002, 06:49originalas archived
↳ follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · by subject
3 quoted lines
From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk <matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk> Why "Retribution"? The Increate's servants seem to be looking for - or even forcing - some sort of redemption in Man. If they are responsible for the wounding of the sun (a view I favour) I'd be more inclined to see it as a stimulus or goad pushing towards that goal.
Precisely. You have just restated my case. Redemption and retribution come to the same thing in this case. As I quoted before: "The death agonies of the world you know will be offered to the Increate." If that isn't retribution, I'll shoot my dictionary! As to "why" the Increate should regard the deaths of millions, many, many generations removed from the presumed offences of their ancestors as desirable, only the Increate knows. -Roy
matthew.malthouse07 Mar 2002, 10:37originalas archived
↳ follows Roy C. Lackey · by subject
8 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On 07/03/2002 06:49:06 Roy C. Lackey wrote: From: matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk <matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk> Why "Retribution"?
The Increate's servants seem to be looking for - or even forcing - some sort of redemption in Man. If they are responsible for the wounding of the sun (a view I favour) I'd be more inclined to see it as a stimulus or goad pushing towards that goal.
Precisely. You have just restated my case. Redemption and retribution come to the same thing in this case. As I quoted before: "The death agonies of the world you know will be offered to the Increate." If that isn't retribution, I'll shoot my dictionary! As to "why" the Increate should regard the deaths of millions, many, many generations removed from the presumed offences of their ancestors as desirable, only the Increate knows.
I think that's why I didn't like the word: the punitive aspect was strongest in my mind and my dictionary emphasises 'deserved' which I cannot see. As for redemption, four definitions are near sysnonyms for retribution while the fifth perculilarly Christian one - salvation from sin through [Jesus'] sacrifice - runs counter: those saved don't pay, the payment has been made... I'm not making any sort of case here, just registering a distinct unease with the apparent concequences. Matthew
Steve Strickland10 Mar 2002, 06:59originalas archived
↳ follows matthew.malthouse · by subject
Is the scene with Rudesind, the only one in BOTNS in which the irrigation of Lune is discussed? I'd always assumed--I'll admit without much thought on the subject-- that the discussion of the "irrigation of Lune" in the early part of TSOTT was sort of an oblique reference to the sun's weakening. Since the light of the moon is a reflection of the sun's light, the pale green light of the moon would have given way, I suppose, to a darker green, as the sun began to weaken. This historical fact, that over time the moon changed from pale green to darker green, became, in the folklore of a civilization whose science was declining, the afforestation of the moon, which of course would require water to make it work. This also seems to me to be consistent with Mr. Wolfe's interest in folklore as being derivative of some truth or half-truth (in this case, that the moon had darkened required explanation). Of course, it is also possible that through some advanced technology the moon had actually been made into a forest. Are there other references in TBOTNS to the irrigation of Lune, or its forests, that might shed more light on whether this is merely a matter of folklore arising from the weakening sun, vs. a fact of science? Steve Strickland ----- Original Message -----
19 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
From: <matthew.malthouse at guardian.co.uk> To: <urth at urth.net> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:17 AM Subject: Re: (urth) Re: The irrigation of Lune On 02/03/2002 06:37:36 Jeff Wilson wrote:
From: "Andy Robertson" <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk>
Rudesind and others of his society can't be expected to be cognizant of what else besides mere irrigation would be required to cover the moon with forest. After whatever other modifications it would take to keep an atmosphere in place, yes it would have to be irrigated. And while it does not sound like something of ineffable, recall that Father Inire's Gardens allow a confluence of Gyoll and the Lake of Birds; for all we know he diverted a tributary of the Brook Madregot to water Green/Lune. In addition, this sort of sweeping up and piling of asteroids would relieve the metal scarcity problem supposedly caused by all the ships and ordnance leaving Urth, never or seldom to return.
Out of curiosity does anyone have near to hand an estimate of the mass of the solar system, what proportion of that would be in the small bodies and what proportion of those metals? Following the thought logically, rather than with literary intent, mining / collecting metals in near space would seem an obvious move once space flight was available. It doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that this had been done. Hence my curiosity about quantity because that and usage rates might suggest timescales. Matthew --
Jerry Friedman11 Mar 2002, 23:07originalas archived
↳ follows Steve Strickland · by subject
4 quoted lines
--- Steve Strickland <SSTRICKLAND at satx.rr.com> wrote: Is the scene with Rudesind, the only one in BOTNS in which the irrigation of Lune is discussed? I'd always assumed--I'll admit without much thought on the subject-- that the discussion of the "irrigation of Lune" in the early part of TSOTT was sort of an oblique reference to the sun's weakening.
Good heavens, people keep coming up with things I never would have imagined! I may be too trusting to read Wolfe.
2 quoted lines
Since the light of the moon is a reflection of the sun's light, the pale green light of the moon would have given way, I suppose, to a darker green, as the sun began to weaken.
I don't think moonlight is green, or not in any sense that would make it darker green if the sun were dimmer. The rocks are pretty much light rock-colored, I believe. Anyway, if we assume the forests are real, I think there's a good question of how green it would look in the light of Old Sun (reminds me of Leigh Brackett). Of course, Severian is used to seeing things by red light, but Horn and Hoof are not.
6 quoted lines
This historical fact, that over time the moon changed from pale green to darker green, became, in the folklore of a civilization whose science was declining, the afforestation of the moon, which of course would require water to make it work. This also seems to me to be consistent with Mr. Wolfe's interest in folklore as being derivative of some truth or half-truth (in this case, that the moon had darkened required explanation). Of course, it is also possible that through some advanced technology the moon had actually been made into a forest. Are there other references in TBOTNS to the irrigation of Lune, or its forests, that might shed more light on whether this is merely a matter of folklore arising from the weakening sun, vs. a fact of science?
... Severian refers once or twice to "the forests of Lune", if I remember correctly, but that only tells us that he believes in them. Jerry Friedman

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net