Poor Moly

James Wynn · 27 Nov 2002, 15:21 · from urth-v0211.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "James Wynn" <crushtv at HotPOP.com>
Subject: RE: (urth) Poor Moly
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:21:39 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0211-2275 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0211/2275.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Some nice catches in your last post. Thanks.

But in your verbose post, somehow you never addressed the fact that Silk
says bio prosthetic technology was not available to Rose and Marble (LS3:1).
I realize there is a reason you missed it. <g>

Her "LIE" about being at the Sun St. cenoby since before humans came to
Viron was made in front of Hammerstone and Hammerstone would have known if
it weren't true of Moly. That's simply beyond debate.

I maintain, I haven't really changed on this, that the "old hands" you
mention are an intriguing mystery, but they affect not at all the two points
above.

Again, thanks for the refinements on my Molybdenum story. They are greatly
appreciated.

-- Crush

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net