Poor Moly

Roy C. Lackey · 03 Dec 2002, 03:54 · from urth-v0212.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Poor Moly
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:54:47 -0600
Message-ID: <urth-v0212-2339 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0212/2339.txt.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>Crush responds:
>If one femchem was as good as another to Hammerstone, why did he leave
>Marble and have the child they were making broken up when she revealed that
>she was Magnesia?

I probably shouldn't even ask, but **where, in or out of the whorl, did you
get such an idea???**

>Whether femchems **looked** the same or not (and I contend there **must**
>have been **some** visual difference so bios could tell who they were
>dealing with and so they could locate chems who ran away without paying
>their building indenture), surely Hammerstone knew **something** of the
>particular femchem he was married/engaged to like say... ***where she
>worked.****  You aren't denying I presume that Hammerstone and Moly ever
>met??

Sure, he met her, but not at Sun Street. Moly didn't work at a cenoby. She
was a **housemaid** (LS3: 3), according to Hammerstone, and is so described
in the list of characters, as distinguished from a "maid-of-all-work", which
is how Marble, nee Magnesia, is described in the list of characters in LS4.

>"I have heard it said that she was the oldest biochemical person in this
>quarter, and it may well have been true. _She belonged to the last of those
>fortunate generations for which prosthetic devices remained_, devices whose
>principles are lost even to our wisest." (emphasis added)

>Roy continues:
>The question of whether or not prosthetics can still be made, or are being
>made, becomes moot for purposes of this argument. The quote establishes,
>once again, that Rose got her prosthetics many years ago (two generations),
>when they were still readily available. That suffices to undermine your
>theory that they came from Betel, who had taken them from a
>murdered/martyred chem maid. There was no need for that.
>
>Crush responds:
>Where are you getting this? We know Rose got her parts about 40 years ago
>(probably less). Actually you have argued that she got *most* of her parts
>more recently.

Nope. What I actually said on the subject was: "Rose didn't receive all her
prosthetics at the same time, that's all; she would have scared the hell out
of that boy if she had. Much of her face was prosthetic, both arms and both
legs, her "ears", one eye, and a host of internal organs."

And, actually, Rose got her first prosthetics (the hand and arm Blood saw as
a boy) **more** than forty years ago. Blood was born when she was 40. She
lost touch with him when he was 9. She was about 94 when she died.

>That is NOT **many** years ago by any stretch, nor is it the
>time period typically associated with "two generations."

Two generations _is_ many years, in terms of a human life span.

>The only reason I have for saying Betel got the parts first, is the flags
in
>the **text**. Marble insisted on continuously being shriven of her "lie" to
>**Betel**. Marble inherits from **Betel** yellowed ivory beads (which I
>assure you are remarkably like betel nuts in color and shape) on a silver
>chain (the color of molybdenum). Not from the text, but also significant
IMO
>is that "betel" is a narcotic made from the leaves of the betel vine mixed
>with mineral lime. I'd love to drop the Betel connection if I could. It
>would make everything so much more tidy.

You have an analogy. Not even a slingshot, much less a smoking gun. I'll
grant you that Wolfe doesn't always leave a smoking gun in plain sight, but
I want to at least smell the smoke.

-Roy

--=20

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net