Voided cross

pthwndxrclzp · 15 May 2005, 11:46 · from 2005-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: aquastor at gmail.com (pthwndxrclzp)
Date: Sun May 15 11:46:47 2005
Subject: (urth) Voided cross
In-Reply-To: <200505151314.05540.ddjones at riddlemaster.org>
References: <200505151314.05540.ddjones at riddlemaster.org>
Message-ID: <2124d6b1050515114629bf1706 at mail.gmail.com>

I always figured it looked something like this (forgive the ASCII non-art):

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
x                                 x
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx   xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This also fits in with the "Sign of Addition" stuff, as far as I see
it (though that may be so obvious it's not worth mentioning).

Aq

On 5/15/05, Daniel D Jones <ddjones at riddlemaster.org> wrote:
> Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS?
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net