At 08:22 AM 12/3/2002, marc wrote:
Here is a mechanism that we may want to look at for time travel:
Remember that when Fava and Inclito's mother tell their stories, the narrator has the ability to enter their story. In other words, he can alter events that he hears about and use his "power" to enter the story. He actually appears in Inclito's mother's story as a figure from her past, while he changes Fava's story. I argue that his astral travel can be based off of something that he hears about - and that one of Typhon's big concerns when he scanned himself into mainframe was the conciliator, so that when Silk's spirit is reunited with his body from Pig at the very end of the flashback scenes of return to the whorl, it brings with it Pas' preoccupation with the figure of the Conciliator - and it also programs him with Typhon's obsession to meet and possibly influence the conciliator, sending Silk's spirit across time to find that man at his true birth - his baptism in the river. If you want to argue that Severian was not dead at the exact first time that Silk appears, you have to factor in the very significant drowning in Gyoll that must be taking place EXACTLY as Silk appears in that time - the true birth (or death) of the Severian we know - and therefore the logical focal point for his vivimancer-hood.
Now this is a good thought, but what does it mean? I'm finding it hard to wrap around Typhon's supposed concern to find the Conciliator, this being passed on to Passilk, and then on to the Narrator, etc.
I suggest we think more about the Outsider here, since Severian's baptism is clearly Outsider stuff. Like Silk's enlightenment, it is his point of initiation into his "messianic calling."
Silk has been Enlightened when the Holy Spirit falls upon him. This is clearly like Jesus' baptism, and thus like all baptisms. Later, Silk himself undergoes death, burial, and resurrection. Now the Narrator arrives on Urth right at the time of Severian's baptism, death, and first resurrection. That seems a better link, IMO: that one specially baptized man is drawn to the moment of another special man's baptism.
At the moment Severian is starting his new life, Silk Plus appears to him and spends a little time with him. Is there some passing on of Silk Plus's wisdom to Severian implied, if only a few key thoughts? Is the Narrator helping Severian become the Conciliator?
This SEEMS the right moment in Severian's young life for Silk to arrive and pass on his wisdom to him.
Now, either this is a coincidence in the overall historical "plan" of the Outsider, so that Silk's lifespan has come to the same point in time as Severian's baptism on Urth; or else as you have argued there is a draw across time to this event.
One might argue, building on the above, that the draw across time is the baptism of Severian. The baptized, and then dead & resurrected, and now mature and aged Silk, himself clearly a "conciliator," is drawn across time to meet the Conciliator right at the beginning of his new life, precisely because of who Silk is and who Severian is. If this does not seem like "good SF," remember that Silk's enlightenment was a "purely spiritual event" not paralleled by anything "scientific." In this narrative the Outsider is a player, though only openly an occasional one.
At the same time, if the only "mechanism" is the plan of the Outsider, a link of the Spirit so to speak, then a "draw across time" is no more credible than the "historical-predestinated coincidence" option discussed above.
In defense of the Blushas thesis, I can point out that "looping in time" is a theme in the Severian books, and that introducing this event might hint at another loop: Silk, living much later in history, goes back in time to help initiate the Conciliator's work. This notion by itself seems quite Lupine. But I submit we need corroborative evidence for a "draw across time," for by itself this "coincidence" need be nothing more than the "plan of the Outsider" to bring both events together at the same time.
At present, I'm satisfied with the notion that Silk precedes Severian in time, and that Severian is partly a disciple of Silk.
Nutria
Nutria wrote:
I suggest we think more about the Outsider here, since
Severian's baptism is clearly Outsider stuff.
Well ... Increate stuff. ;*)
5 quoted lines
Like Silk's enlightenment, it is his
point of initiation into his "messianic calling."
Silk has been Enlightened when the Holy Spirit falls
upon him. This is clearly like Jesus' baptism, and thus like
all baptisms.
Well, all "valid" baptisms ... I wouldn't care to make the argument that, say, John's baptisms (at least prior to Jesus' showing up) necessarily brought the HS to the baptisee ... but that's one of those theological details what bore so many of our participants ...
1 quoted line
Later, Silk himself undergoes death, burial, and resurrection.
Goodness. And can it have happened that none of us has thought of Horn's experience in the pit that way? I know I haven't, but now suddenly it smashes me in the face as one of those "too obvious to notice" things Wolfe purloinedlettricly scatters all over his texts.
1 quoted line
Now the Narrator arrives on Urth right at the time of Severian's baptism, death, and first resurrection. That seems a better link, IMO: that one specially baptized man is drawn to the moment of another special man's baptism.
Ummm. Three specially baptised men, counting whatever is left
of Horn, and counting Pas, who has also died and been resurrected at this point ... But with all due respect, that seems more like a thematic reason (akin to the gun-waiting-to-be-fired) than an in-story mechanism; why, in plot-logic rather than thematics, does the Narrator appear at that time? It remains simpler (imho) to presume that there's no time-travel involved.
(Indeed, you recognize the thematic value when you say:
2 quoted lines
This SEEMS the right moment in Severian's young life
for Silk to arrive and pass on his wisdom to him.
)
2 quoted lines
Now, either this is a coincidence in the overall
historical "plan" of the Outsider,
With God there are no coincidences...
3 quoted lines
If this does not seem like "good SF," remember that Silk's
enlightenment was a "purely spiritual event" not paralleled
by anything "scientific."
I have trouble accepting that ... Wolfe, throughout the Sun books, goes to a great deal of trouble to maintain a sort of ambiguity where the events that seem supernatural also have a naturalistic explanation (though those explanations often feel quite unsatisfying when stated baldly). In the case of Silk's enlightenment, he tosses us Crane's theory of a cererbral accident -- as a herring so red that nobody in their right mind will believe it; leaving us wondering where the "real" naturalistic explanation lies. I have never found it, but remain convinced, because Wolfe has otherwise kept his method so consistent, that he must have planted it somewhere: possibly someplace where Crane's theory hides it from us...
2 quoted lines
In this narrative the Outsider is a player, though only
openly an occasional one.
With the exception of Silk's enlightenment, does the
Outsider make any other interventions that don't have
alternate, "naturalistic" explanations?
1 quoted line
In defense of the Blushas thesis, I can point out that "looping in time" is a theme in the Severian books, and that introducing this event might hint at another loop: Silk, living much later in history, goes back in time to help initiate the Conciliator's work.
While remaining firmly dubious about the "later in history/goes back in time" part, the rest, I find quite delightful ... one might even see the Narrator's appearance in Severian's life as somewhat akin to the way John the B plays the Elijah role in Jesus' life. (While Silk stands very much as a Moses figure, he seems to have aspects of many of the major prophets, notably Jeremiah...)
1 quoted line
At present, I'm satisfied with the notion that Silk precedes Severian in time, and that Severian is partly a disciple of Silk.
If this does not seem like "good SF," remember that Silk's
enlightenment was a "purely spiritual event" not paralleled
by anything "scientific."
I have trouble accepting that ... Wolfe, throughout the Sun books, goes to a great deal of trouble to maintain a sort of ambiguity where the events that seem supernatural also have a naturalistic explanation (though those explanations often feel quite unsatisfying when stated baldly). In the case of Silk's enlightenment, he tosses us Crane's theory of a cererbral accident -- as a herring so red that nobody in their right mind will believe it; leaving us wondering where the "real" naturalistic explanation lies. I have never found it, but remain convinced, because Wolfe has otherwise kept his method so consistent, that he must have planted it somewhere: possibly someplace where Crane's theory hides it from us...
Yeah, but in the interview Wolfe said it was purely supernatural, and my question was whether it as purely "scientific" or both in a parallel way. I agree that we really seem to "need" something more than just a spiritual link between Silk and Severian; I was just pointing out that if this is all there turns out to be, it is not wholly unlupine.
5 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
In this narrative the Outsider is a player, though only
openly an occasional one.
With the exception of Silk's enlightenment, does the
Outsider make any other interventions that don't have
alternate, "naturalistic" explanations?
Is there another explanation for Silk's resurrection?
Nutria
Yeah, but in the interview Wolfe said it was purely
supernatural,
Oops. I fergot all about that...
5 quoted lines
and my question was whether it as purely "scientific" or
both in a parallel way. I agree that we really seem to
"need" something more than just a spiritual link between
Silk and Severian; I was just pointing out that if this
is all there turns out to be, it is not wholly unlupine.
Okay, I'll buy that.
5 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
In this narrative the Outsider is a player, though only
openly an occasional one.
With the exception of Silk's enlightenment, does the
Outsider make any other interventions that don't have alternate, "naturalistic" explanations?
Is there another explanation for Silk's resurrection?
Ummm, he was only mostly-dead? (If he was completely dead,
they'd have gone through his pockets for loose cardbits.)
The piece of Severian that (I think it's) Don says is going
to be in him resurrected him?
Gene Wolfe did it?
Oh well ... Yeah, I'm just futzing. Clearly the Outsider
acts as a major player a lot in the Long/Short books,
not least in the Eucharist on Blue.
Urth Net