Fifth Head of Cerberus: Shadowchildren vs. Abos
I found a transcript of a chat w/ Gene Wolfe
http://home.austin.rr.com/lperson/wolfe.html
Here is an interesting quote:
-------
LP: "'A Story,' by John V. Marsch."
GW: "'A Story,' by John V. Marsch," yes, which is not actually written by John V. Marsch, but by the shadowchild who has replaced John V. Marsch. (laughs) That's New Wave. But belonging to a literary movement doesn't consist so much in using a certain set of techniques, as it consists in running with a certain set of people, and only to a very small degree did I run with that set of people. So as I said, I would be very peripheral as a New Wave writer.
-------
So if Wolfe is being truthful, Marsch was replaced by a shadow-child, not a humanoid abo. Meaning that VRT is a shadow-child.
I know there was an unresolved debate about whether shadow-children are the original abos or are the result of early space fairing humans degenerating due to addiction to the drug found on the planet.
Anyway, this doesn't really clear that argument up, but if Wolfe is truthful it certainly makes me think differently about the story, because "VRT" was described as a human in Marsch's journal... but then again, maybe VRT edited even the earliest parts of Marsch's journal to simply say that VRT looked human to Marsch?
If what Wolfe says is true this also means the shadow-children themselves (or at least VRT) can shapeshift... which we hadn't seen discussed or mentioned before, it seemed that the shadow children weren't able to do this in "A Story".
Might VRT be a shadow-child + abo hybrid, rather than human + abo hybrid?
Anyway this has left me more confused than ever about the abo vs shadowchild vs settler conundrum but I certainly found Wolfe's quote interesting and surprising.
Maybe you guys have other ideas about this. Then again, Wolfe is quoted as laughing after saying the VRT = shadowchild line...