On dream travellers

Gerry Quinn wrote: Afterward, Hide said he had no

I wondered that. I don't think it can be exactly the same, because Severian spends much of his later life as an aquastor, and I'm fairly sure he digests. But Malrubius' remark that he is solid, despite being just a dance of particles, because every body is just a dance of particles, is surely relevant to dream-travellers as well.

Yes, Barbatus explains that: "What you call eidolons are not ghosts, but beings maintained in existence by some external energy source. What you call matter is all, in actuality, merely bound energy. The only difference is that some is held in material form by its own energy. and "...when you cam here, you had lived a long time...During all that time you breathed ate, and drank matter that was not unstable, converting it to your body's use. Thus it became a substantial body". So, yes, eidolons can eat and digest. Severian digesting is actually essential to him becoming "real". Dream travellers may be able to produce deadly swords and viable sperm but they can't eat and digest and become part of the world/time/universe they have travelled to.

There seems to be a bit of talking past each other here. James seems to be saying that beings in dream travel take on a new form of existence, where some physical laws apply and others don't. Roy seems to be saying beings in dream travel are pure, unsubstantial ghosts or spirits because they can walk through walls. But I don't see how he explains why such beings can be harmed by physical weapons. (I still think the answer lies in folktales/mythology etc. How can a poltergeist throw things around if it has no physical existence? Same for other mythological-type beings- they must have some physical presence in our world or we'd be unable to know anything about them. Yet they don't follow the physical laws of our universe either. Perhaps a "half in-half out" sort of existence.)

I think it was the reverse. Interestingly, Wolfe says in a interview somewhere that Ares was not really a war god, but a soldier god. (In the same interview he says that Aphrodite was not a love goddess but a sex goddess. This is striking, because Kypris is a title of Aprhrodite, and the Whorl goddess of that name definitely is a love goddess. One must suppose that Typhon, not being too well up on mythology, said 'You can be a love goddess', and she grew into the role.)

I am reminded of the BotNS story where one angel is bleeding to death and the other muses that if he had known it possible he would have been more careful in the past.

Not sure if you caught it earlier, but I think there is some relationship between this stuff and Barbatus' explanation that eidolons need to eat, breathe etc. to replace their unstable matter with stable, self-sustaining matter allowing it to become real.

I think you are on a roll here James. (though I wonder if Tolkein's Ents and their varied stages of consciousness/tree-ness was an influence)

Another difference is that the eidolon becomes an independent branch of the original. From that moment, there are two of the original. This is not the case for the dream-traveler. In IT terms, the astral body at first SEEMS to be a "client" of the corporeal body (this is the relationship Roy seems to be driving at). When the soul "returns" to the corporeal, the astral body and any child processes it has created (weapons, people, etc) are destroyed. This is efficient since it would other cause a lot of useless corpses to be left around. It is actually more complex than that, and somewhat to the contrary. The astral body is not supported by the corporeal form during dream-travel. It is robust and self-sustaining (without the NEED to take food). During dream-travel it appears that actually the astral body temporarily becomes the parent process and the corporeal form the child process (the unstable dependent process). I say this because: * If the corporeal body dies, the astral body can continue to run on its own without debility. * If the astral body dies, this is a catastrophic crash: You are left with the astral corpse undestroyed (a "zombie" process) and the soul cannot "reboot" on the corporeal side. The soul on the astral side is claimed by the Increate. When the soul moves to astral form, the "system" erases the version on the corporeal. This prevents identity confusion when the soul is re-integrated. When the soul successful returns to corporeal, it is re-written to the corporeal form before destroying the astral. This is why killing the astral body is catastrophic but killing the corporeal body is not. Not that Wolfe was likely thinking in these terms, but the model is, I think, an accurate representation of the rules and limitations. Additionally, I think the Rajan could afford to be non-chalant about being "not really here" during dream-travel because he could return at any time. This is not the case for anyone traveling with him. They could be marooned at the will of the Rajan and they could not bug-out at the first hint of danger. ᚹ

I think these sound similar to the properties of "real" astral travel, as per out of body experiences/Madame Blavatsky/Castenada eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astral_body The soul travels away from the corporeal body in a subtle body, and can get stuck. The descriptions I have read also involve light weight threading ;) [from subtle body to corporeal body]. Moving slightly off topic, does anyone else like The Star Rover? Cheers, David Duffy.