Urth Net
Short Sun books inaccessible?
↰ answers William Ansley
· by quotation
1 quoted line
on 2/19/01 11:51 PM, William Ansley at wansley at warwick.net wrote: Despite my satisfaction in revelations, I believe that a novel should be entertaining on a surface level so that it can be enjoyed by someone who isn't aware of all the buried layers of meaning that may be present, even if that enjoyment is shallow compared to the "deep" enjoyment of the reader who does make the extra effort to penetrate as many of the underlaying layers as he or she can.
[snip]
1 quoted line
But I worry because I also think that Wolfe has succeeded less in the SS books in providing both an accessible surface layer and a coherent framework for understanding the underlying layers. Wolfe should write what he wants to write, of course, but if he really is writing for a smaller and smaller group with each book, how much longer will his books continue to be published? Publishers exist to make a profit, especially now. Perhaps Wolfe's oft stated fears that his next submitted work will not be accepted for publication are more realistic than we realize.
As I said earlier, I don't think RTTW is the most obscure of Wolfe's books; nor do I think any of the SS books are among the most obscure. Possibly I'm overestimating the reading acumen of the average Wolfe-buying SF reader, but I really think the narrator's identity is not that difficult to determine. Certainly Wolfe provides more explicit indications than he does of "Marsch"'s identity in "V. R. T.," let alone Weer's state in PEACE.
I agree that RTTW's surface layer is less immediately enjoyable than that of some of his other works, but I don't think it's because of too many "buried layers of meaning"; I think it's because of the arbitrariness I mentioned in an earlier post, and the number of subplots he leaves dangling. (Of course, it's possible that these reflect some hidden meaning that I've missed.)
1 quoted line
I also have to admit that I enjoyed the SS books less than the LS books and those less than the NS books,
I would rank the New Sun books first, the Short Sun books second, and the Logn Sun books third.
2 quoted lines
If Wolfe does write another
book that continues the LS/SS series, I am going to have to think long and hard before I decide whether I am going to read it.
I would definitely read it, but I hope he doesn't. Frankly, I think seven books is more than enough for this particular corner of Wolfe's universe.
2 quoted lines
I really
feel that I would have understood and therefore enjoyed RttW better if I had re-read all of the LS and the previous two SS books immediately beforehand. But I just didn't have time.
Me neither; nor did I have the inclination to reread LS (one of the things I didn't particularly like about RTTW was that it was much more closely tied to the LS books than were the other two SS books, not just in taking place largely on the Whorl, but in the return of the possession theme and the whole murder-of-Pas plot). But I may have to.
4 quoted lines
To rephrase one
of the questions above:
Has Wolfe crossed the line from legitimately challenging his readers to asking far more of them than can reasonably be expected?
To rephrase one of my answers: I think Wolfe sometimes does ask more of his readers than can reasonably be expected; sometimes, perhaps, without realizing he is doing so. But I don't think he does so in the Short Sun books more than in his others.
--Adam
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.