Urth Net

Index · 4 messages · 4 voices · 25 Apr 2001

the problem with de-evolutionWhorl

Download this conversation
maa3225 Apr 2001, 10:12originalas archived
the problem with de-evolution
If the inhumi all refuse to feast on human blood since they become "good" from good humans, then their offspring would return to mindless animals. There is nothing to prevent the mindless animals that are the children of good inhumi from sucking off of the people, especially with a colony of humans on Green. They would have no scruples, then their children would be intelligent. It would just be a threat to humans with alternating generations of inhumi. I don't like this golden rule idea. *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes25 Apr 2001, 11:03originalas archived
↳ follows maa32 · by subject
1 quoted line
If the inhumi all refuse to feast on human blood since they become "good" from good humans,
A debatable premiss, but consider the result as if it were a given.
1 quoted line
then their offspring would return to mindless animals.
Correct so far.
1 quoted line
There is nothing to prevent the mindless animals that are the children of good inhumi from sucking off of the people,
Also correct. But Horn does not say the secret will make the inhumi non-dangerous, only that it will make them no more dangerous than crocodiles.
1 quoted line
They would have no scruples, then their children would be intelligent.
Intelligent, yes, but (ex hypothesi) benevolent. So you would have the "alternating generations" situation you suggest, but the threat would be greatly reduced, as the dangerous inhumi would be the mindless animals. (As a side note, how many people are actually attacked by alligators and the like in a given year? I presume that proper precautions could make the threat from non-sentient inhumi no greater than that from crocodilians.) *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Kevin J. Maroney25 Apr 2001, 14:51originalas archived
↳ follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · by subject
2 quoted lines
At 11:03 AM 4/25/01 -0700, Blattid wrote: (As a side note, how many people are actually attacked by alligators and the like in a given year? I presume that proper precautions could make the threat from non-sentient inhumi no greater than that from crocodilians.)
My understanding is that the number of human attacks from crocodilians is very low. They're much like wolves that way--feared as human predators all out of proportion to the actual danger they present. Which isn't to say that they can't sometimes be very dangerous, indeed.
Wombat, a.k.a. Kevin Maroney kmaroney at ungames.com Kitchen Staff Supervisor, New York Review of Science Fiction http://www.nyrsf.com *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Michael Straight25 Apr 2001, 16:00originalas archived
↳ follows Kevin J. Maroney · by subject
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Kevin J. Maroney wrote: At 11:03 AM 4/25/01 -0700, Blattid wrote:
(As a side note, how many people are actually attacked by alligators and the like in a given year? I presume that proper precautions could make the threat from non-sentient inhumi no greater than that from crocodilians.)
My understanding is that the number of human attacks from crocodilians is very low. They're much like wolves that way--feared as human predators all out of proportion to the actual danger they present. Which isn't to say that they can't sometimes be very dangerous, indeed.
So how many people are actually attacked by inhumi in a given year (not counting weddings)? Of those, how many suffer any permanent harm? -Rostrum *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net