Recently re-read the Book of the New Sun, and I was wondering about this detail: Typhon, after being awake for a while and having a look around (with his sensors I presume), tells Severian that there are powers in the sea who would rule now. But, he clarifies, we will rout their armies.
How can Typhon be so cavalier about the presence of telepathic monsters in the sea? If his technology is still so much greater, why hasn't one of the Autarchs found and used it? Is it bluster on Typhon's part, or he does he have some prior knowledge of the monsters? Was he the power who had the woman with the black beans ripped to pieces (and they grew, slowly, into Abaia, etc. )
Also, why does Jonas know so much about Erebus, etc.
I once, long ago, conjectured that Severian was lying about the whole event, as I could never quite accept the breaking of Piaton's nose. If Typhon is a telepath himself (or has mind-control technology). . .
On 1/27/2014 7:12 PM, Jonathan Goodwin wrote:
How can Typhon be so cavalier about the presence of telepathic monsters in the sea? If his technology is still so much greater, why hasn't one of the Autarchs found and used it?
Some they have, but as Sev notes in a few places, much of the gear is password protected.
1 quoted line
Also, why does Jonas know so much about Erebus, etc.
Jonas is widely traveled on Urth, including some time travel before his shipwreck. Also, as part machine, he may have better memory than Severian.
1 quoted line
I once, long ago, conjectured that Severian was lying about the whole event, as I could never quite accept the breaking of Piaton's nose. If Typhon is a telepath himself (or has mind-control technology). . .
He may be like Asimov's The Mule, in that he can bind minds without necessarily being able to read them.
Recently re-read the Book of the New Sun, and I was wondering about this
detail: Typhon, after being awake for a while and having a look around (with his sensors I presume), tells Severian that there are powers in the
sea who would rule now. But, he clarifies, we will rout their armies.
How can Typhon be so cavalier about the presence of telepathic monsters
in the sea? If his technology is still so much greater, why hasn't one of the Autarchs found and used it? Is it bluster on Typhon's part, or he does
he have some prior knowledge of the monsters? Was he the power who
had the woman with the black beans ripped to pieces (and they grew,
slowly, into Abaia, etc. )
I think it is not so much bluster as confidence. Typhon conquered many worlds in the past, and he is ready to start over again. If he fails, he fails, but he does not talk uselessly of failure. He has access to information technology at least. Perhaps he does not expect to control Erebus etc. immediately, but to make a temporary alliance, and afterwards take Urth from them.
I don't think Typhon is portrayed as quite a god here, but as a sort of powerful 'force of nature' - a super villain, you might say, who can be brought to heel only by the super-powered Severian.
He may or may not have been the executor of the woman who sowed the black beans (which I too assume to be an origin myth for the sea monsters) but he presumably has some inkling of what they are and of their capabilities - the Autarchs seem to as well, though we are not told much.
- Gerry Quinn
No dia 28/01/2014, ?s 01:12, Jonathan Goodwin <joncgoodwin at gmail.com> escreveu:
1 quoted line
I once, long ago, conjectured that Severian was lying about the whole event, as I could never quite accept the breaking of Piaton's nose. If Typhon is a telepath himself (or has mind-control technology). . .
It's been a while since I've read it, but does Severian not clarify to have relied on Typhon's instinct being quicker than the mind?
I know I see people feel and do all sorts of things that are contrary to reason. Protecting oneself in a fight seems like a good context for it.
I find Typhon to be a fascinating character, but to be honest I feel he does not get enough narrative attention. He's obviously a key figure in the Short Sun series, but to me he seemed almost an afterthought in New Sun. I would really welcome some additional literature from Wolfe exploring Typhon's world.
3 quoted lines
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote:
I don't think Typhon is portrayed as quite a god here, but as a sort of powerful 'force of nature' - a super villain, you might say, who can be brought to heel only by the super-powered Severian.
There are a lot of biblical parallels (usually name references like Dorcas/tabitha) in Wolfe but that scene is probably the most direct riff he has ever done, offer for offer by Satan to Jesus. It is memorable but also unusually heavy handed for Wolfe- almost ironically so, I think, when we consider how many people Severian actually saves. It's also why having Silk be Typhon's heir (biological or otherwise) is so interesting.
Sent from my iPhone
6 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Jan 28, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Darrell Burgan <darrell.burgan at gmail.com> wrote:
I find Typhon to be a fascinating character, but to be honest I feel he does not get enough narrative attention. He's obviously a key figure in the Short Sun series, but to me he seemed almost an afterthought in New Sun. I would really welcome some additional literature from Wolfe exploring Typhon's world.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote:
I don't think Typhon is portrayed as quite a god here, but as a sort of powerful 'force of nature' - a super villain, you might say, who can be brought to heel only by the super-powered Severian.
No dia 29/01/2014, ?s 21:59, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> escreveu:
1 quoted line
There are a lot of biblical parallels (usually name references like Dorcas/tabitha) in Wolfe but that scene is probably the most direct riff he has ever done, offer for offer by Satan to Jesus.
And made at the top of a mountain looking at the world!
11 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
It is memorable but also unusually heavy handed for Wolfe- almost ironically so, I think, when we consider how many people Severian actually saves. It's also why having Silk be Typhon's heir (biological or otherwise) is so interesting.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Darrell Burgan <darrell.burgan at gmail.com> wrote:
I find Typhon to be a fascinating character, but to be honest I feel he does not get enough narrative attention. He's obviously a key figure in the Short Sun series, but to me he seemed almost an afterthought in New Sun. I would really welcome some additional literature from Wolfe exploring Typhon's world.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote:
I don't think Typhon is portrayed as quite a god here, but as a sort of powerful 'force of nature' - a super villain, you might say, who can be brought to heel only by the super-powered Severian.
_______________________________________________
I know Severian is broadly considered to be a Christ figure, but to me that symbolism goes only so far. Severian is also capable of acts of considerable violence and other deplorable acts, things that the Christ would never do. Ironically I find Silk to be much more of a Christlike figure in that regard. Severian did save the world, so he is definitely a messiah figure, but he also killed almost everyone in the process. One of the things I love about Wolfe is that his symbols are a patchwork. Rotate the view 90 degrees and everything is different. It's one of the reasons I can read his books again and again and never get bored.
1 quoted line
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: There are a lot of biblical parallels (usually name references like Dorcas/tabitha) in Wolfe but that scene is probably the most direct riff he has ever done, offer for offer by Satan to Jesus. It is memorable but also unusually heavy handed for Wolfe- almost ironically so, I think, when we consider how many people Severian actually saves. It's also why having Silk be Typhon's heir (biological or otherwise) is so interesting.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Darrell Burgan <darrell.burgan at gmail.com>wrote: I know Severian is broadly considered to be a Christ figure, but to me that symbolism goes only so far. Severian is also capable of acts of considerable violence and other deplorable acts, things that the Christ would never do.
"We say Jesus was a carpenter, but the only thing we are told he actually made was a whip."
--Gene Wolfe
3 quoted lines
Ironically I find Silk to be much more of a Christlike figure in that regard.
Silk is more of a Moses figure...
I have always felt that the symbols in New Sun were a bit more shifty than in some of his other work - Severian's ironic thoughts of the conciliator at a costume party, healing of the sick, stumbling three times in the cataract at Thrax from the weight of the sword as he heals, the Typhon temptation running almost line by line with the temptation in the wild, ... And yet sev not even being the one put on trial, not actually saving pretty much everyone we meet in the narrative but instead somehow contributing to their watery demise. The coin of Vodalus being fake, with all it import and weight, has always disturbed me - since it resonated as a symbol of the sun- why fake? more than just trust in vodalus' path being false faith, i think. The hell green turned into really does make a lot of that conciliator talk seem like conscious rhetoric on Sev's part meant to seem unconscious - a ruler insinuating but never stating divinity (in the first four volumes, anyway)
The biggest surprise to me on the first read was that the conciliator was not actually contiguous with Christ, because the rhetoric in shadow certainly suggested it- the texts Severian looks over as a young man with their saints and halos clearly catholic or orthodox in nature.
Certainly Christ shows up in Silk's "enlightenment", though (which I think ultimately has a physical cause and is once again a man imitating another divinity and in so doing serving It)The voice of the outsider can speak through another man's voice, or through a man and his lover as he sets up his heir to follow out a plan that ultimately will not come to fruition as he (typhon/pas) intended.
Sent from my iPhone
10 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:26 AM, "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Darrell Burgan <darrell.burgan at gmail.com> wrote:
I know Severian is broadly considered to be a Christ figure, but to me that symbolism goes only so far. Severian is also capable of acts of considerable violence and other deplorable acts, things that the Christ would never do.
"We say Jesus was a carpenter, but the only thing we are told he actually made was a whip."
--Gene Wolfe
Ironically I find Silk to be much more of a Christlike figure in that regard.
Silk is more of a Moses figure...
_______________________________________________
Certainly the "Outsider," i.e. the God of Christianity, can and does use such things to further His plans. As Joseph says to his brothers, "What you meant for evil, God meant for good."
That the Conciliator is not Christ is clear in the text -- the Theoanthropos is a different person.
18 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: I have always felt that the symbols in New Sun were a bit more shifty than in some of his other work - Severian's ironic thoughts of the conciliator at a costume party, healing of the sick, stumbling three times in the cataract at Thrax from the weight of the sword as he heals, the Typhon temptation running almost line by line with the temptation in the wild, ... And yet sev not even being the one put on trial, not actually saving pretty much everyone we meet in the narrative but instead somehow contributing to their watery demise. The coin of Vodalus being fake, with all it import and weight, has always disturbed me - since it resonated as a symbol of the sun- why fake? more than just trust in vodalus' path being false faith, i think. The hell green turned into really does make a lot of that conciliator talk seem like conscious rhetoric on Sev's part meant to seem unconscious - a ruler insinuating but never stating divinity (in the first four volumes, anyway)
The biggest surprise to me on the first read was that the conciliator was not actually contiguous with Christ, because the rhetoric in shadow certainly suggested it- the texts Severian looks over as a young man with their saints and halos clearly catholic or orthodox in nature.
Certainly Christ shows up in Silk's "enlightenment", though (which I think ultimately has a physical cause and is once again a man imitating another divinity and in so doing serving It)The voice of the outsider can speak through another man's voice, or through a man and his lover as he sets up his heir to follow out a plan that ultimately will not come to fruition as he (typhon/pas) intended.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:26 AM, "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Darrell Burgan <darrell.burgan at gmail.com>wrote:
I know Severian is broadly considered to be a Christ figure, but to me that symbolism goes only so far. Severian is also capable of acts of considerable violence and other deplorable acts, things that the Christ would never do.
"We say Jesus was a carpenter, but the only thing we are told he actually made was a whip."
--Gene Wolfe
Ironically I find Silk to be much more of a Christlike figure in that regard.
Silk is more of a Moses figure...
As I said, the first time I read it i understood the conciliator as contiguous with the agent of reconciliation (Christ, communion, confession) but that was the 80s and I was in the fourth grade. I am not certain that in the first four books the theoanthropos and the conciliator are really all that distinct, will have to pay attention to that when I read it again.
Sent from my iPhone
Heh, that's an awesome quote. I find it to be great fun that Wolfe mixes up his symbolism a bit to keep the reader on her toes. One definitely has the sense that something of biblical proportions is happening throughout the Solar Labyrinth series, but one is damned if they can put their finger on exactly what it is. I love it.
2 quoted lines
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>wrote: "We say Jesus was a carpenter, but the only thing we are told he actually made was a whip."
--Gene Wolfe
Marc Aramini: There are a lot of biblical parallels
(usually name references like Dorcas/tabitha) in Wolfe
Darrell Burgan: One definitely has the sense that something of biblical proportions is happening throughout the Solar Labyrinth series, but one is damned if they can put their finger on exactly what it is.
In my view, the trick is to observe that Wolfe uses as many, and probably more, "mythological" references as Judeo-Christian references. Gleaning from some hints in Wolfe interviews, I take this to mean that Wolfe does not think of Judeo-Christianity as evolving from a vacuum. The mythology of the pagan neighbors of the ancient Hebrews reflected their own beliefs which portrayed the extant reality of the ancient world as much as the Bible does, albeit with differently named, though often cognate characters (and events, like the Flood).
Thus if we are meant to understand Typhon's temptation of Severian
as parallel to Satan's temptation of Christ, we should take a good analytical look at Wolfe's choice in calling this character "Typhon".
Surely the status of mythological Typhon as a dragon/snake monster
is meant to connect to the satanic link of the Edenic serpent who
tempts Eve. Moreover, the Greeks did consider Typhon as a rather
satanic being, especially in his cognate connection to the evil
Egyptian deity, Typhon-Set. Then there is the fetal creature called the Mandragora..
1 quoted line
Jonathan Goodwin: How can Typhon be so cavalier about the presence of>telepathic monsters in the sea?
I find mythological Typhon's title as "Father Of All Monsters" to be explanatory for this issue. His confidence in his superiority over
these beings stems from the knowledge that he is their father.
Scylla is named in BotNS as a megatherian (by the caloyer of Saltus) and it would seem that Wolfe expected us to figure out the Typhon parentage to the megatherians just from that one small clue.
Happily, he seems to have realized this was unfair to his readers and he took pains to make it clear in Long and especially Short Sun that Scylla is Typhon's daughter and that she finds expression in the giant sea monster on Urth. Moreover I am convinced by the end of RttW, that this Great Scylla monster of Urth is, in some fashion, also the same being as Abaia, gender having no real meaning for such creatures.
Actually, having a singular identity does not have real meaning for such creatures either (as we see for Tzadkiel). Thus I suspect some of the confusion between Abaia and Erebus is that they are actually partitions of the same original being.
There is even a mention, in Long Sun, of Pas' daughter Scylla having her
own planet to rule somewhere. I think this mention is a reference to Scylla/Abaia/Erebus on Urth.
Urth Net