Urth Net

Index · 3 messages · 3 voices · 23 Nov 2011

Urth Digest, Vol 87, Issue 179

Download this conversation
Andrew Mason23 Nov 2011, 22:47as archived
Urth Digest, Vol 87, Issue 179
↰ answers James Wynn · by quotation
2 quoted lines
James Wynn wrote: Andrew, I don't know if you saw my response to you on 11/9... http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2011-November/024264.html ... but at that point I posed that the Mucor traveling with "Pike's ghost" is Mucor from Blue on her mission to locate Silk for Horn.
Yes, I saw this - I'm not doubting that there is a way to explain it within the time-travel theory. I just wanted to see if a simpler explanation could be given.
1 quoted line
** If it seems that Wolfe did not provide enough clues for this, remember that this is the same thing as Auk kidnapping Hy for sacrifice and then realizing that "she was not the woman he was supposed to bring." There was no explanation of _that_internal struggle either.
Why do you say he kidnapped her for sacrifice? It seems to me - admittedly with the benefit of hindsight - that what happened is reasonably clear. Tartaros said 'Go to the woman...A woman is vital'. Auk looked around for Chenille (whom Tartaros certainly meant; he had told Auk to comfort her a page earlier), but she had disappeared. So he ran out and grabbed Hyacinth. Later, Tartaros told him to let her go, when the balance of his mind had been restored. There's no explicit 'Ah, now I realise...', but presumably he did, as he let Hyacinth go without arguing.
James Wynn23 Nov 2011, 23:12as archived
↳ in reply to Andrew Mason
4 quoted lines
On 11/23/2011 4:47 PM, Andrew Mason wrote: James Wynn wrote: Yes, I saw this - I'm not doubting that there is a way to explain it within the time-travel theory. I just wanted to see if a simpler explanation could be given.
Maybe Roy will chime in on this.
2 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
** If it seems that Wolfe did not provide enough clues for this, remember that this is the same thing as Auk kidnapping Hy for sacrifice and then realizing that "she was not the woman he was supposed to bring." There was no explanation of _that_internal struggle either.
Why do you say he kidnapped her for sacrifice?
Well, he did kidnap her. The very requirement to kidnap someone assumes that no one could be procured to go willingly.
2 quoted lines
It seems to me - admittedly with the benefit of hindsight - that what happened is reasonably clear. Tartaros said 'Go to the woman...A woman is vital'. Auk looked around for Chenille (whom Tartaros certainly meant; he had told Auk to comfort her a page earlier), but she had disappeared.
I'm not sure it is obvious. I don't think he ultimately presents Chenille. So, if she was vital... If Tartaros needed any woman (as his statement implied) why not Hy?
António Pedro Marques23 Nov 2011, 23:23as archived
↳ in reply to James Wynn
James Wynn wrote (23-11-2011 23:12):
1 quoted line
If Tartaros needed any woman (as his statement implied) why not Hy?
Ha!

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net