Supervisionists

On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com<mailto:danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com>> wrote: he kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity

On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:02 AM, "Norwood, Frederick Hudson" <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> wrote: ?If I had any supervision, Fred, would I be riding around in a chicken coop with a lion? Rick Norwood From:Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Dan'l Danehy-Oakes Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:18 PM To: The Urth Mailing List Subject: Re: (urth) general video discussing Wolfe and literature Superversionists? On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote: That's how it's done- beat 'em at their own game. Are practitioners superverts or superverters? On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Matthew King <automatthew at gmail.com> wrote: On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:

he kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity

"Superversion" as John C. Wright calls it. _______________________________________________